Search results

@jony1996 North East There was a broken page somewhere around page 309, so I might be missing 50 athletes. Also, since people have submitted some 18.5 scores I had to throw those out and remove the overall(CF) total points and rankings. After looking at this data, I'm not convinced that it's...

@shonspawnel In the Olympics you get a gold medal by beating your opponent. Doesn't matter by how many pounds, or even if you set a record in the process. It's the only way to really measure people in competition. It should be the same with CrossFit events. It's ok if you win the event without...

@sean33606 I should also mention that it's worth looking at the people above you that moved up (negative overallDelta) to compare their scores to yours.

@sean33606 My original idea was to just take the top100 athletes and re-rank them against each other because I saw opportunities where the 13th place guy in a workout ended up 2437th overall, taking legitimate points away from legitimate athletes. Based on the outcome, I couldn't help but...

@sean33606 Anecdotally, people will not like the system if their rank is worse. A total of 180 isn't bad at all. It should put you around 50th-60th rank overall. The system isn't designed to find the +10 athletes, it's to find the -50 to -2000 athletes who demonstrate overall potential but got...

@jnnp I can't believe there are so many other mathletes in this subreddit.

For any given set of athletes, total points earned over a series of workouts should determine the overall fittest athlete. With sufficiently designed workouts, the strongest athletes should excel in strength workouts; the fastest athletes should excel in speed workouts. Consider power...