Search results

@revjrm2047 I agree with you from the perspective of finding the fittest. However from the perspective of the semi competitive athlete it's pretty fun and a good second test to see where you stand with the more difficult movements. It's also good from a financial perspective for CrossFit.

@revjrm2047 Yeah I'm disappointed with that one. I was really hoping for something like Chase ingraham predicted (alternating movements) 50-40-30-20-10 GHD 10-20-30-40-50 Row cals

@tennesseegirl1993 Mine didn't. My scores were posted to the leaderboard. Judge was certified.

@bapi1 I don't think so. I think I that is the exception and not the rule and generally only applies when specifically stated.

@ministrymindset Only if CrossFit publishes them.

@theinformer The 255 failure was interesting. Vellner has seemed to be struggling with his overhead movements over the last two years, I wonder if this is another of the same instance.

@haytem That makes sense to me. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me to give AGOQ the same volume but less time.

@haytem I was wondering the same thing. Last year it was the same as Open QF.

@dawn16 Mine was updated about a week ago.

@rene88 Im so sorry, you're probably right. I should have posted the link the first time. I wonder if it's available now:

@rene88 Search CrossFit games day 2 primetime

@rene88 YouTube has them now.

@mesch Yeah all today we are getting hyped about podium placement, and then they are like idk, Pat won, cu next yr!!!

@sonorous me too. fuck that. (maybe slip an anonymous tip to hq and they can test everyone there)

@yennora I think we get something more advanced to finish.

@spinny Very cool workup! I'm still trying to wrap my head around this method. If I may ask you to generalize, what would categorize athletes that receive large rank increases vs. large rank decreases under your method?

@spinny Nice post, but if I may suggest something: For your last example it would have been helpful if you ordered the participants in alphabetical order in the first part, and then ordered them in their new order in the next part to help the reader more easily distinguish the changes in the...

@starrysunsets To my knowledge this is based on a meta analysis that showed eating 600g-800g had an effect on lifespan in general as well as improving longevity in people with cancer and cardiovascular disease. Source: https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/46/3/1029/3039477