Search results

@monte Ah cool. Thank you very much, glad we talked about it!

@monte Ok, i am sorry to be a bit annoying, but what you qouted what they said, but simply and on your own added the 2.2 part. They refer to a figure in this part. Statistically, what happens is they estimated a point at which the regression breaks. They do this because they first observe a...

@monte ok, maybe i am confused. I see two links. The first is a hughe text document that disagrees with the numbers we gave. The second is a picture of something with diminishing gains. Or do you refer to the italic text? Because i only consider stuff a source that atleast allows to identify...

@monte I do not disagree with anything you say. I also do not attempt to disprove you or anything, and the numbers i remembered are in line with what you said. I simply looked at the source you give and noticed that this source disagrees with the statements we have made here.

@monte Ok, your source disagrees with you. PDF pages 73-74 deal with protein requirements during exercise, then they summarize: "Summary. In view of the lack of compelling evidence to the contrary,no additional dietary protein is suggested for healthy adults undertakingresistance or endurance...

@monte Yeah i was looking for this meta-study where which you seemed to qoute. Or is your cursive text in the dokument you posted? Could you tell me the page, then i can look for the study myself. Very interssting, check out digital page 50 which is pdf page 637. That sthe requirement for...

@monte Fully agree, 0.8 is the normal recommendation for keeping your muscles. Considering Vegans need to transform a bit more amino acids one could even make a case that playing it save is 0.9 - for keeping your weight. To build muscle, you definitivly want to hit more then that. Could you...