christhasrisen2000
New member
As a frequent traveler for work, I've had the unique opportunity to drop into numerous Crossfit gyms and observe their distinct cultures. Broadly speaking, I've noticed two predominant cultures in the Crossfit world:
Corporate Crossfit often promotes the "Crossfit for everyone" mantra, showcasing senior athletes in its social media and emphasizing the medicinal benefits of Crossfit. This message has the potential to resonate with many, especially those who can afford $200+ memberships. However, there's a noticeable gap between this inclusive messaging and the dominant RX culture in many gyms.
So, what's the way forward? Should Crossfit strive for a harmonious blend of both cultures, believing that members often start at a beginner's pace and gradually embrace the competitive spirit? Or should there be a stronger emphasis on inclusivity, which can be as basic as showcasiing the beginner or intermediate versions over RX on Crossfit Corporate’s daily WODs.
This is a topic I've pondered for a while, but recent discussions on here highlighting Crossfit's stagnant growth are making it top of mind.
I'm curious: Do you think Crossfit should evolve its approach to be more in line with the "this is medicine" marketing message, or is the current dynamic what really defines it and leave well enough alone?
I kind of go back and forth in my head on this and I'm not sure what a less "RX-y" Crossfit would even look like, so curious what you all think.
- RX Crossfit: This is the competitive side of Crossfit. Athletes here are encouraged to push their limits, aiming for feats like muscle-ups, pistol squats, and power cleans over 200 lbs. The atmosphere is often all about competition; members often participate in local comps, and there's a strong focus on the leaderboard. This culture seems to cater more to the under-40 crowd.
- Crossfit Is Medicine: This approach is about holistic fitness and well-being. The emphasis is on individual progress, perfecting form, and ensuring safety. Workouts are often modified based on one's capabilities (e.g. your RX is a percentage of your 1 RM), and there's a greater focus on self-improvement rather than external competition. This culture seems to resonate more with those over 40, beginners, or those wary of injuries.
Corporate Crossfit often promotes the "Crossfit for everyone" mantra, showcasing senior athletes in its social media and emphasizing the medicinal benefits of Crossfit. This message has the potential to resonate with many, especially those who can afford $200+ memberships. However, there's a noticeable gap between this inclusive messaging and the dominant RX culture in many gyms.
So, what's the way forward? Should Crossfit strive for a harmonious blend of both cultures, believing that members often start at a beginner's pace and gradually embrace the competitive spirit? Or should there be a stronger emphasis on inclusivity, which can be as basic as showcasiing the beginner or intermediate versions over RX on Crossfit Corporate’s daily WODs.
This is a topic I've pondered for a while, but recent discussions on here highlighting Crossfit's stagnant growth are making it top of mind.
I'm curious: Do you think Crossfit should evolve its approach to be more in line with the "this is medicine" marketing message, or is the current dynamic what really defines it and leave well enough alone?
I kind of go back and forth in my head on this and I'm not sure what a less "RX-y" Crossfit would even look like, so curious what you all think.