Search results

@mikeck I will defo check it out - Strong App is near on perfect though, not sure if you've tried it.

@tongdtbds3 Another one for MacroFactor. It’s basically all you need.

@ablessedwoman Reading OP’s replies to the obvious comments is a painful, painful experience

@mikeck Thanks. The offline logging is a must for me personally - my gym has very poor reception and they just stopped offering WiFi for whatever shit reason. Second, I don't know about you but I personally like to be able to build in the target reps and sets into the workout when I set it up...

@stephheartbroken To your first point, when you replace the exercise, it does save the work that you've done. At the end of the workout, the option that pops up is asking you if you want to permanently save the change to the routine. Clicking no still saves the replacement exercise sets and reps...

@exilesinwaiting Agreed, haven't yet checked this out but I would be surprised if anything comes even close. Its perfect. Edit: do you mean Strong?

@brianlee3271 I think you already have the right idea. In your method each set is taken to roughly the same RIR - you’re right in saying that doing each set in a linear fashion would mean some sets being quite far from failure. Don’t overthink it, to be honest either is fine. Just keep going.

@eil I don’t think you understand the point - if you did 3 RIR on 3 sets, the reps would decrease as you become more fatigued. No way you did the exact same reps with the exact same weight and RIR, it doesn’t make sense. I don’t think you’re as good at gauging RIR as you think.

@mike230 Gotcha

@mike230 Yes so you’re agreeing with the commenter - it’s not possible to do the same RIR with the same weight 3 times in a row.