Search results

@polychordtetra Thank you for this experience of it in action! I really appreciate it, and it helps make sense, and it's reassuring to hear it from an athlete.

@chantelle1989g Thank you! Yes, I think their feeling is that some extra calories will be made up since they know it's not super precise re: macros. I didn't know they called bacon only protein... but it's a good excuse to eat more bacon ;)

@lvw Thank you for this. I will revisit my math. (I was going at 1 g per pound of LBM based on my activity level, which is relatively high.) Much appreciated!!

@alaric Okay, thanks - so you're also in line with the Zone recommendations as far as muscle mass maintenance. I guess there is the distinction right there. Makes sense!

@theological1988 Thank you - yes, more precision that way.

@theological1988 Thank you :) And yes, it is definitely lower than what I've done for years. Some experimenting is in order.

@dawn16 Oh, in kilos... I have often read as many g in protein as weight in pounds, so you would be a lot closer to those Zone recommendations. Thank you for your input that it was good for recovery and gains. Much appreciated!

@janssenfromcanada Thank you for this :) Much appreciated!

Hello. I keep wondering why the Zone dietary protein requirements consistently come in a bit lower than other strength-based recommendations. 40% of estimated lean body mass gives me only 95 g of protein daily, whereas many others recommendations put me at more like 120-125 g daily. I would love...