@christian6000 Yeah, I don't know where she puts it. She might be in that weight class, rather than at that weight? I'll see if I can find anything.
EDIT: A year ago, she gave her bw as 170lbs. That's at least more believable.
@christian6000 http://www.all-alls.org/orlov/kuzmina/photos2006/Natalya_Kuzmina_wp.jpg
I think the arms and shoulders alone could account for the weight.
Not to mention this. Jeez, that's a wide stance.
@christian6000 She's thick. Unlike a lot of women lifting that high, though, her bf% doesn't look too high. In other words: looking good; super stronk.