@servant52 I appreciate the edits explaining that you're also eating in a deficit. What were trying to say is that the exercise doesn't matter. It's not part if fat loss. If you eat 2 sour patch kids, you'd need to run a lap around a track to burn it off. If you add mayo to a sandwich, that's 2 and a half miles of running. If you use ranch rather than a 30 calorie vinaigrette, that's 2-4 miles.
You're explaining a training modality in depth that does not impact your goal, and asking if it's the best way to reach your goal. If you like biking, cool. If you like walking with the dogs, cool. If you want to lose weight, going from 30 minutes of cardio/walking/whatever to an hour a day - from 6000 steps to 10,000 - will help, but cardio is for heart health, not weight loss.
Here's an example of what we're hearing and why we're confused. "I'm trying to build my deadlift. I do curls three times a week. The first session is 3x5 barbell curls and 3x10 hammer curls. The second workout I do 6x10 preacher curls and adjust the weight each set so I'm always failing at 10 reps. The third workout, I do 21s where I do 7 full reps, then 7 top half partials and 7 bottom half partials, but I've been hearing about stretched partials recently. Is this curl routine most efficient at getting a bigger deadlift?" Is that curl routine good? Yah, but for bicep growth. Bicep improvement isn't going to hurt my deadlift, but there's a fundamental misunderstanding if I'm doing that curl routine in order to get a bigger deadlift. In order to improve my deadlift, I should 0robably deadlift. Cardio is not weight loss. Calorie control via food prep is weight loss. Cardio is for cardio.