@dawn16 No i am not new to lifting - i lifted for around 4 years, then took about a year and a half off and now i have been training for coming up to 3 years so i have a decent amount of experience.
My post history where i have 2 posts on HIT lmao. Yeah i am on nofap, no that does not mean i believe in the concept of nofap religiously at all - i also am in the christian subreddit yet i am not a christian. You moron, using 0 logic their bro.
Nope, incorrect considering i do not have social media.
Also btw i have a degree in sports science - but yes, i must be stupid lol.
Okay, first to debunk the 1st vid - which is not HIT, so that dismisses that with very little effort - very poor choice their.
Second, the jonni shreeve video once again does not even understand the basics of HIT - just assumes the training is to go to failure on everything - which is just one aspect of the training, but misses everything else. The claim that HIT taxes the nervious system more is unfounded, in fact the evidence points towards volume being more of a taxer then failure. His claim that volume builds muscle is literally wrong - house of hypertrophy did a good vid on this just search it - it is a common misunderstanding. Volume is a negative side effect of training - obviously if we could do less volume this would be beneficial. The claim that this program is for only enhanced lifters and natties should be careful is wild considering these programs are made for natties lmao - also just feeds into the ignorance of CNS fatigue due to volume which i mentioned. The mention of CNS fatigue but ignorance of its actual causes is odd. He says we must go with the science, yet the science does not disprove HIT, imo they are both good approaches (HIT & Trad bodybuilding style)
Lastly, the dr mike vid which literally at the end of the video he says that if you doing HIT then the intensity makes up the lack of volume so nowhere in that does he go against HIT lmao. The vid is not about HIT it is about failure, so he is saying that if you do normal volume and go to failure it is not worth it, but he literally says if you do HIT it makes sense - but he clearly does not like HIT saying you should be 'normal' and do more traditional volume, doesnt give a reason why. Same thing with the cns on volume here as well.
A common theme i see is these guys talking about how taxing going to failure is but the data literally says more volume and doing cardio is more taxing on the cns then going to failure, GVS talks about this a lot since he is known for going to failure a lot - he also has vids on HIT that do not disprove it but his main criticisms are why not add more volume if you need it... then he corrected himself in the edit because Mentzer already said that lol
Great job at literally proving nothing there lmao
