I saw the scientific journal posted on here 19 days ago about the 1g protein/lb myth (2.2g/kg).
I weighed in this morning at 133 lbs. My 4-day morning average is 132.85 lbs (60.26kg).
I was following the 2g protein/kg bodyweight guideline. But it's really hard for me to get 120-121g protein in one day while staying within my calorie maintenance of 1,770 calories daily (BMR reading from my digital body analyzer. I'm 37 5'5.75" have six-pack abs. My body fat % reading on the scale seems too high to be accurate compared to the mirror test and my improving lifts but it's whatever). I'm trying to do a mini-recomp before I bulk back up again.
To stay within my calorie budget (1,770) and get my protein recommendation (120.5g), I need at least 27% of my calories to come from protein. Or a 6.8% protein g to calorie ratio (14.7 calorie/protein g ratio is easier to eyeball when looking at the nutrition information without a calculator).
According to the study, a strength athlete (bulking?) doesn't get any more additional benefit above 1.8g protein/kg of body weight.
An endurance athlete doesn't get additional benefit above 1.4g protein/kg of body weight.
And apparently if you are cutting, you can retain more muscle mass during your cut if you hit 2g protein/kg of body weight. Considering that you are consuming less calories but having to eat more protein allegedly during a cut, that would make for a very high protein-to-calorie ratio compared to bulking no? I'd imagine that 2g protein/kg of body weight would make more sense for bulking, not cutting. Am I wrong?
I completed a 6 month cut late September and lived a completely sedentary lifestyle before. I've been doing a bulk/recomp in the last 40 days. (I switch between the two depending on how fast my weight is going up. My weight gain was going fast so I switched to recomp. My 7-day average has been going down recently so I upped my calories beyond maintenance yesterday). I first joined a gym mid-July and only really lifted with light dumb bells at home and body weight exercises like crunches before joining the gym. And my local Planet Fitness, my first gym, sucked because the weights I needed were constantly being used. My new gym I joined in mid-August has a much bigger weight rack (deadlift ban though just like PF since it's still a budget gym. Just more weights and less cardio machines than Planet Fitness) and good resistance training equipment. So I'm still in the newbie gains phase.
If I'm doing a recomp (maintenance) and want less body fat and more muscle mass, should I aim for 2g protein/kg of body weight? Or can I get the max muscle gain/fat loss benefits from less protein than that?
I just consumed at least 86g of protein today thus far. But I had to consume like 70g of whey protein powder, 12 oz of skim milk and 98g of "clean carb" mass gainer powder in order to get there. And this is a workout day. On rest days it's hard for me to get 120g+ protein (Yes I know I'm not trying to put on mass atm but I like the easy carbs from the mass gainer and milk pre-workout to fuel it and post-workout for the glycogen for muscle recovery/growth and I don't like training on a full stomach). I'd rather not have to supplement so much protein in my diet and eat more yummy carbs and fats. Heh.
Thanks
I weighed in this morning at 133 lbs. My 4-day morning average is 132.85 lbs (60.26kg).
I was following the 2g protein/kg bodyweight guideline. But it's really hard for me to get 120-121g protein in one day while staying within my calorie maintenance of 1,770 calories daily (BMR reading from my digital body analyzer. I'm 37 5'5.75" have six-pack abs. My body fat % reading on the scale seems too high to be accurate compared to the mirror test and my improving lifts but it's whatever). I'm trying to do a mini-recomp before I bulk back up again.
To stay within my calorie budget (1,770) and get my protein recommendation (120.5g), I need at least 27% of my calories to come from protein. Or a 6.8% protein g to calorie ratio (14.7 calorie/protein g ratio is easier to eyeball when looking at the nutrition information without a calculator).
According to the study, a strength athlete (bulking?) doesn't get any more additional benefit above 1.8g protein/kg of body weight.
An endurance athlete doesn't get additional benefit above 1.4g protein/kg of body weight.
And apparently if you are cutting, you can retain more muscle mass during your cut if you hit 2g protein/kg of body weight. Considering that you are consuming less calories but having to eat more protein allegedly during a cut, that would make for a very high protein-to-calorie ratio compared to bulking no? I'd imagine that 2g protein/kg of body weight would make more sense for bulking, not cutting. Am I wrong?
I completed a 6 month cut late September and lived a completely sedentary lifestyle before. I've been doing a bulk/recomp in the last 40 days. (I switch between the two depending on how fast my weight is going up. My weight gain was going fast so I switched to recomp. My 7-day average has been going down recently so I upped my calories beyond maintenance yesterday). I first joined a gym mid-July and only really lifted with light dumb bells at home and body weight exercises like crunches before joining the gym. And my local Planet Fitness, my first gym, sucked because the weights I needed were constantly being used. My new gym I joined in mid-August has a much bigger weight rack (deadlift ban though just like PF since it's still a budget gym. Just more weights and less cardio machines than Planet Fitness) and good resistance training equipment. So I'm still in the newbie gains phase.
If I'm doing a recomp (maintenance) and want less body fat and more muscle mass, should I aim for 2g protein/kg of body weight? Or can I get the max muscle gain/fat loss benefits from less protein than that?
I just consumed at least 86g of protein today thus far. But I had to consume like 70g of whey protein powder, 12 oz of skim milk and 98g of "clean carb" mass gainer powder in order to get there. And this is a workout day. On rest days it's hard for me to get 120g+ protein (Yes I know I'm not trying to put on mass atm but I like the easy carbs from the mass gainer and milk pre-workout to fuel it and post-workout for the glycogen for muscle recovery/growth and I don't like training on a full stomach). I'd rather not have to supplement so much protein in my diet and eat more yummy carbs and fats. Heh.
Thanks