@dawn16 this
is true, but also in some sense not true.
IMO, American colleges are basically like, institutionalized mistake-making zones for 18-21 year olds to do fuck all and have very little consequences (I am a product of this). Unlike higher Ed in the rest of the world, US colleges more like "social experiences," rather than actual learning, + branding (the quality of teaching at most courses like top 1-1000 school, I would reckon, are by and large fairly uniform; indeed, it's even possible that someone at harvard teaching the intro course would be a worse teacher than someone at a lower ranked school given the lack of teaching emphasis in the former)
But also, I think when you're 18-21, you
should take advantage of the fact that you basically have zero responsibilities to anyone but yourself. you can only "train" for so much with so much intensity throughout the week. and going to college is the easiest way, I think, to discover what works for you and what doesn't, and that includes people, teachers, friends, potential partners, subjects that interest you and don't interest you, etc
If I were in a position to advise Emma, I would say ultimately the money in CF right now is not worth the squeeze of just a
singular focus on it,
nor do you need to. College and CF I don't think need to be mutually exclusive, or doing both means half-assing both; they can, I think, for a young athlete be really complementary if done right. Especially all the personal stuff concerning development of a self-concept and self-identity is super important for an athlete. Suppose Emma decides to do this, and then Day 1 she gets an injury; what then? (definitely not wishing for that - just entertaining counterfactuals). Don't know what else she has her in life, but I think thinking about these support structures are important.
anyway - good luck to her